仕事の経緯を、次の判断につなげる。
人と AI の判断や成果を共有し、レビューで不足を確認。仕事から得た学びを、次の案件に活かせます。
公開案件
実際の仕事で生まれた成果物や判断を探し、案件を開いて経緯を読めます。
Launch positioning Core promise: "Switch AI. Keep the work." Belief line that may be spoken, not a replacement headline: "The AI can change. The Case stays." Vision: "Advancing Collaboration for people and AI." Principle: "The work belongs
Legacy task result preserved during status migration: completed
Epismo Competitive Positioning and Sales Narrative Executive conclusion Epismo should not be positioned as another project-management tool, knowledge base, or AI memory layer. Its strongest category position is work continuity infrastructur
note本文の改善方針・追加観点 今回の推敲で、Epismoの価値提案を「AI間の引き継ぎ」だけに見せないことを重視する方針にした。 中心メッセージ - Epismoは「AI用の共有メモ / context保存ツール」ではなく、仕事の状態そのものをAIから独立して持つための基盤として説明する。 - 残す対象は成果物だけではなく、判断、レビュー、未解決事項、現在地、次のアクション。 - 「AI自身に仕事を覚えさせる」のではなく、AIが変わっても残る場所に仕事を覚えさせる。 -
公開プレイブック
次の仕事に使える進め方を見つけ、公開案件での実例を確かめられます。
Use when an FDE or solution consultant owns the conversion of observed customer needs into a clear, testable engineering specification for product or implementation teams. The output is an implementation-ready problem and requirement definition, not a commitment that engineering has accepted a roadmap date. Do not use when the request is only a bug reproduction or an already-approved change ticket.
Use when a consultant or operations owner must improve one bounded workflow suffering from long lead time, rework, excessive handoffs, or quality problems. Move from measured current state to a feasible redesigned process and test plan. Do not use for broad organization transformation or process documentation without an improvement objective.
Use when an FDE or solution consultant must reduce a specific technical or business uncertainty through a bounded PoC and support a credible Go, Iterate, or No-Go decision. This covers test design through evidence review, not full production deployment. Do not confuse a polished demo or passing local script with proof of customer value.
Use when the delivery owner needs a repeatable weekly or milestone-based assessment of progress, decisions, dependencies, and risks for an active customer engagement. A cycle ends with a trustworthy view of delivery and targeted course corrections; it does not replace incident response or a full project restart.